A great blog by Robert Joseph on another load of Single Issue Fanatics on "factory" wine etc. Check it out on http://thejosephreport.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/big-can-be-beautiful-too-and-small-can.html
These people's missionary zeal seems to have no bounds and I have taken the liberty to compose a suitable hymn for them which also encompasses the "natural" fanatics credo (with apologies to Reginald Heber).
From Mendoza's icy mountains to Queensland's coral strand
Where Afric's sunny fountains roll down their golden sand
From many an ancient vineyard, from many a Riverland plain
They call us to deliver their land from error's chain
What though the sulphur breezes blow hard o'er NZ's isle
And every prospect pleases and only big is vile?
In vain with lavish kindness the gifts of God do come
The heathen in his blindness bows down to chips and gum
Shall we, whose souls are lighted with wisdom from on high
Shall we to those benighted the natural wine deny
Salvation! O Salvation! The joyful sound proclaim
Till earth's biggest conglomerates has learned Messiah's name
Waft waft, ye winds, our story and you, ye waters roll
Till like a sea of glory, it spreads from pole to pole
Till o'er our ransomed nature the yeast for sinners slain
Peasant, plough, handmaker, in bliss returns to reign.
You can find the original text on http://www.scriptureandmusic.com/Music/Text_Files/From_Greenlands_Icy_Mountains.html
Happy new year everyone - let this be a year of peace and tranquility all over the world and let everyone be left alone to do their own thing without interference from anybody else.
Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Sunday, December 2, 2012
Miami Airport - Avoid!
Some years ago, we bought a week's timeshare in a South
African resort for the magnificent sum of $376. I won't say where it is, but we did
visit it and whilst it was pretty downmarket and somewhat seedy, it has given
us the opportunity to exchange our week with some more upmarket places. We've
been to India, Zimbabwe and Mexico and this time, we obtained a week in Aruba,
a Dutch colony island in the Caribbean.
Getting there, however, was hardly fun. The cheapest way to
fly was with American Airlines via Miami. The problem with connecting flights
in the US is the time needed to go through the rigmarole of immigration even if
you are not staying in that country. On top of that, your bags are not checked
through to your final destination, so you have to pick them up, go through
customs and re-check them in again,
Originally there was a two hour time gap between the
landing time in Miami and the take off time to Aruba, but this was cut by 20
minutes when they re-scheduled the flight to Aruba. In theory, this should have
still given us enough time to clear all the immigration hurdles. However, the
plane arrived an hour late and despite having priority through immigration, due
to Sonia requiring a wheelchair as she had recently had an operation on both
her knees, it was to no avail. We missed our connection.
So we were traipsed off to the American Airlines
re-connection desks (and there were many) to get another reservation. Of
course, there were no more flights to Aruba until the next day, so that meant
one day less in Aruba. After quite a long time, we finally got
re-booked but were told that we couldn't get a boarding pass until the next
day. "Come two hours before the flight for this" we were told. All
this without turning a hair - there were about 100 people waiting to be
re-booked - this is obviously a frequent occurrence so it is why they have a
special ticketing department to do this. I asked if they would put us up at a
hotel. "Of course," they said,
"and we will give you vouchers for dinner and breakfast".
"That's mighty civilised of them" I thought, but the vouchers were
for $12 each for dinner and $7 each for breakfast. Hardly enough for an appetizer at the hotel
restaurant, so we used out breakfast voucher to defray the cost of the dinner,
thinking that we might snatch a bit of grub on the plane. Some hopes!
Well, at least, we had a free hotel room. All re-booked
people were put up at the Miami International Airport Hotel and the room
allocated to us was a tiny claustrophobic room with no windows! We were told
that "that's all American Airlines would pay for". I think this hotel
must have been built as a kind of purgatory location for re-bookers before
deciding whether they are going to paradise or not! Well, the hotel front desk
took pity on Sonia's knees and upgraded us to a bigger room.
In fairness to the hotel, we
slept in a very comfortable bed with a good bathroom and the staff were very
helpful. But it's quite clear that American Airlines are still in a state of
poor financial health.
We decided to check in three
hours before the flight and luckily we did. There was such chaos at the check
in but we did manage to get checked in although it took the best part of an
hour.
So the verdict on Miami airport is Avoid. That is unless you plan to make an overnight stop there
because it's too risky fly onwards with a tight schedule. We could have gone to
Aruba with KLM via Amsterdam, but it was more expensive. However, by the time
we added up our extra costs on this trip we might just as well have gone with
them.
We are not looking forward to our return flight!
Anyway, I am writing this on the beach in Aruba now and
will write again with my impressions of Aruba in the next few days.
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Restaurant Crissier
It’s about 20 years since I last visited the little village
of Crissier, just outside Lausanne, particularly to eat at Giradet, then
considered to be the best restaurant in the world. I had been there a couple of
times before and was amazed – not only for the finesse of the cuisine, but also
for Frédy Giradet’s amazing generosity as to what appeared on his plates. To
boot – it really wasn’t THAT expensive (at least not for what you got); in fact
we did work out once that it was cheaper to fly to Geneva, train and bus to
Crissier, stay in a local hotel garni,
and eat sumptuously at Giradet for less than a weekend in a posh country house
hotel in the UK! The wonderful assistance we received from Giradet’s English
head waiter, John Davey, was an added bonus.
Frédy retired in 1996 to be succeeded by his second,
Philippe Rochat, who now, in turn, has been succeeded by HIS second, Benoît
Violier. Unfortunately, I never got to taste the cuisine of Philippe Rochat,
but a visit last week to a friend living in Vevey, about 20km. away, gave me
the chance to renew my acquaintance with that restaurant. In a way of history
repeating itself, Benoît has just been acclaimed as Cuisinier de l’année, by the Gault
Milau restaurant guide, as Giradet was just before the occasion of my
first visit.
After taking over the restaurant earlier this year, Benoît
went immediately about re-designing his kitchen and restaurant and they re-opened
after 5 weeks of work this autumn. The
restaurant itself consists of two spacious rooms, with naturally well-spaced
tables, beautifully decorated in white setting off the works of art hanging on
the beige background walls.
The real work of art, though, was in the cuisine and here we
were not disappointed.
As is usual on the continent of Europe, there is a selection
of prix fixe menus, ranging from SFR
185 for a “quick lunch” to SFR 390 for a 10 course blow out, but due to
advancing age, I’m not sure if I could take that any more! My two companions,
several decades younger than me, concurred anyway, so we decided to go à la carte. What swung that decision in
a way, was the extraordinary array of game dishes on the menu. It turns out
that Benoît is a game fanatic and is never more at home than when cooking game.
The choice on the carte
was fantastic – Teal, Snipe, Woodcock, Ptarmigan, Wood Pigeon, Venison, Chamois
and Hare, left me drooling and after much humming and ha-ing, I went for the
pan fried Alpine Chamois chops with a pepper sauce. I persuaded my young friend
to be bold and go for his first taste of woodcock and here it was roasted with
a game sauce and accompanied with a giblet tartine.
His wife, perhaps a little less adventurous, went for the pièce of grilled Limousin beef with a grey shallot confit.
Our pre-starter was a velouté of caviar and crispy chopped
vegetables – a really good palate awakener. A fine selection of home-made
breads, spankingly fresh, also got us off to a good start. My starter was an
incredible dish – oeufs en surprise à
l’italienne aux truffes blanches d’Alba façon Philippe Rochat – a tribute
to Benoît's predecessor. This consisted of two lightly boiled egg yolks covered with
concentric rings of spaghetti, looking somewhat like Brünehilde’s breast plates
(although considerably smaller, of course) in a jus made from the egg whites studded with 15 generous shavings of
white truffle. The delicate consistency of the dish made it truly
outstanding. Jean-Daniel’s croustillants de foie gras de canard du
Périgord Noir aux cerises séchées, was intensely flavoured and surprisingly
crusty on the outside with softness on the inside – no mean feat as I have seen
this kind of dish messed up in other places a number of times. His wife,
Roxane, chose Cône de champignons
Sylvestres du pays de Vaud aux truffes blanches du Piemont, sacristains au
cumin – a cone of local wild mushrooms, again garnished with white truffle
shavings and little cumin sticks, rich, but light at the same time.
Oeufs en surprise ȧ l'italienne aux truffes blanches d'Alba façon Philippe Rochat
Cône de champignons Sylvestres du pays de Vaud aux truffes blanches, sacristains au cumin
On to the main courses. My Chamois was utterly delicious –
perfectly cooked à point, and
perfectly accompanied with the pepper sauce enhancing the slight gaminess of
the meat. The only criticism here was that it really wasn’t warm enough for my
taste, but this could have been because it might have stayed too long at the passe, or also because the policy of the
restaurant is to send the dish out from the kitchen without sauces which are
then poured on to the plate afterwards by the waiting staff. That’s a bit of a
double edged sword – on the one hand it’s a good idea because the sauce isn’t
left evaporating on a hot plate in the kitchen before it is sent into the
dining room, but on the other hand, if there is a delay in putting the sauce on
the dish, there is a risk of it getting too cold.
The woodcock was incredible. Split down the centre lengthwise,
you had a perfect mirror effect on the plate. And of course, this made the
eating of it that much easier, particularly in getting into the brain. With a
whole bird, to get to this delicacy, you had to bite into the head and suck out
the brain, but here you were supplied with the tiniest of spoons, so that you
could scoop the brain easily out of the cranium which had been perfectly split
in half. The breast was again, perfectly
cooked à point and the deeply
flavoured, gamey sauce was also light and delicate. I must say that I was very
grateful to Jean-Daniel for letting me have a taste and so pleased that he found
it so delicious as a game-eating novice.
The piéce de boeuf
was based on a classic Troisgros invention of simplicity and accuracy of cooking
although I felt the texture of the beef to be a little tougher than I expected.
Bécasse des bois en salmis, tartine d'abattis "grand siècle"
Pièce de boeuf du Limousin grillé aux èchalotes grises confites
All this was washed down with a bottle of Gamaret 2009 from
Nicolas Bonnet, one of the top producers in the Geneva appellation. Gamaret is
a hybrid grape produced by crossing Gamay with Reichensteiner and is especially
found in French Switzerland. This example had more spicy depth than pure Gamay,
quite full in the mouth and an excellent accompaniment to the game as well as
the beef.
Desserts were a highlight, both pleasing to the eye as well
as the palate. Roxane’s Guyaquil chocolate and coffee fondant was a dense piece
of semi-melted chocolate wrapped around an equally dense coffee ice cream and
Jean-Daniel’s meringues givrées au
citron, orange et pamplemousse was an extraordinary concoction of little
meringue balls hollowed out with frozen lemon, grapefruit and orange sorbet
within – a simple effect, but oh so complex to produce – a masterpiece which
tasted so refreshing and refined. My Baba aux vieux Rhum de Guadeloupe, crème
double de la Gruyère à la vanilla de Bourbon, was a lovely light baba soaked in
alcohol, but I found the accompaniment of the cream cheese a little on the
heavy side and lacking a bit of unctuousness. I drank a glass of Amigne de
Vétroz 2009 from Madelaine Gay, a pretty unique varietal found only in the
Vétroz area of the Valais. This wine is produced either dry, medium or sweet.
Of course I had the sweet version with my dessert, but it didn’t really have
enough sweetness to compliment the dessert, which was a pity, but as such
afterwards it was a very pleasant digéstif.
Meringues givrées au citron, orange et pamplemousse
To sum up – this is one of the finest restaurants that I
have ever been to. The cuisine is accurate, punctilious, and above all,
non-fussy. What I mean by this is that it is wysiwyg. (What you see is what you
get). Everything on the plate, apart being beautifully presented, is edible and
there are no too clever by half inventions or adventures into strange
combinations that may or may not work. That’s very comforting. This is really Haute Cuisine with a capital “H”, a fine
continuation to the guidelines laid down by Frédy Giradet 40 years ago, a
continuation of perfecting traditional standards with modern aplomb.
Benoît and Brigitte Violier
Of course, this doesn’t come cheap. Our meal for three came
to SFR 752 – about £500 or $800, but to sustain this level of quality, a large
brigade of chefs are required in the kitchen and we also shouldn’t forget the
front of house staff as well. In fact, service was pretty night impeccable –
attention to detail without being either overbearing or obsequious was an
important contribution to the overall satisfaction of the evening. And the
sommelier gave us a great call with the Gamaret.
A busy kitchen!
I’m saving NOW to be able to come back next year!
Restaurant de l’Hôtel
de Ville
1, rue d’Yverdon
CH-1023 CRISSIER
SWITZERLAND
Tel: +41 (0)21 634
0505
Food: 49
Wine: 18
Service: 9
Ambience: 5
Value for money: 13
Total: 94
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Gentlemen vs. Players
Last week a bit of a furore arose in the Twttershpere over a blog by a
young man called James Isherwood on visituing Claude Bosi's Hibiscus
restaurant in London. The review didn't make the greatest reading in the
world, but it did severely criticise one dish and the service. Part of
the game, one would have thought but Claude's reaction was, so to speak,
a little OTT, particularly as he thought that having asked James if he
had enjoyed his meal whilst going through the restaurant (as chefs do),
James replied in the affirmative. Having then read his review, Claude tweeted as follows
Nice way to gain respect with chefs...!! I think your a Cunt and this its personal sorry...!! [sic]
and
As a man you should say something to my face when I ask,Please buy yourself a pair of balls and play with them
Now I know that running a Michelin starred restaurant is a very fraught occupation - but this?
It isn't only amateur bloggers who make "mistakes". When I had a restaurant (many years ago) a then leading critic, Jonathan Meades, mumbled "OK" when asked if everything was all right, but still proceded to give a lousy review, compounded by the fact that he wrote that the lamb dish he ate contained curry, which it never did. To me this showed the level of his taste buds to be completely fraudulent, but he did write well. We did conplain to "The Times" and did get a one line apology from them the following week, although it was not on the restaurant review page so probably nobody saw it anyway. To Claude I would say that it isn't easy for someone to criticise a meal to the chef's face, but you do have to realise that you are always going to get criticisms, whether they are fair or not. I'm sure that James's blog will not stop people coming to your restaurant. To James, I would say, don't let this incident stop you blogging. Your reviews will get better and better and don't be afraid to tell the chef face to face if asked whether you enjoyed your meal (or not) if you were not happy. He (or she) will probably call you a c**t there and then but at least it won't be all over the bloggersphere unless, of course, you decided to include that comment in your review!
Nice way to gain respect with chefs...!! I think your a Cunt and this its personal sorry...!! [sic]
and
As a man you should say something to my face when I ask,Please buy yourself a pair of balls and play with them
Now I know that running a Michelin starred restaurant is a very fraught occupation - but this?
It isn't only amateur bloggers who make "mistakes". When I had a restaurant (many years ago) a then leading critic, Jonathan Meades, mumbled "OK" when asked if everything was all right, but still proceded to give a lousy review, compounded by the fact that he wrote that the lamb dish he ate contained curry, which it never did. To me this showed the level of his taste buds to be completely fraudulent, but he did write well. We did conplain to "The Times" and did get a one line apology from them the following week, although it was not on the restaurant review page so probably nobody saw it anyway. To Claude I would say that it isn't easy for someone to criticise a meal to the chef's face, but you do have to realise that you are always going to get criticisms, whether they are fair or not. I'm sure that James's blog will not stop people coming to your restaurant. To James, I would say, don't let this incident stop you blogging. Your reviews will get better and better and don't be afraid to tell the chef face to face if asked whether you enjoyed your meal (or not) if you were not happy. He (or she) will probably call you a c**t there and then but at least it won't be all over the bloggersphere unless, of course, you decided to include that comment in your review!
Monday, November 5, 2012
A Merlot to savour from Roberto Voerzio
Roberto Voerzio is rightly famous for his magnificent
Barolos – some of the most sought after in the world of wine for the sheer
concentration of flavours that he produces from his heavily pruned vines. The
average yield per plant is around 500grams of fruit whilst his neighbour’s
vines could be yielding at least six times that. Over the years he has learned how
not to over extract his wines which can now be considered some of the most
balanced of efforts – provided, of course, you resist the temptation to drink
them too young. With already a legal limit of four years before Barolos can be
sold anyway, it’s still but a small start toward optimum drinkability.
But this blog isn’t about his Barolos. Since 2001 he has
been producing around 350 cases a year of an extraordinary Merlot from the
Fontanezza and Pissotta vineyards in La Morra. I have been in the fortunate
position of having drunk this wine from three of the vintages he has produced
and yesterday I finished my third of the 6 precious bottles I had acquired of
his 2005 wine. Of course, there is no legal time limit for the selling of this
wine, but the Merlot, after having been fermented in stainless steel, and then
spending 15 months in 30% new and 70% used barriques, spent a further 5 months
in stainless steel tanks again and 24 months in bottle before he released the
wine for sale. That’s almost four years in my book! He husbands the vines in
pretty much the same way as he does for his Nebbiolos and Barberas – no chemical
fertilizers, weed killers or fungicides are used which can interfere with the
vegetation cycle of the vines or the ripening of the grapes. His absolute USP
is his customary thinning out of around 50% of the grapes in mid-July with a
further thinning out taking place in mid-August where the size of each cluster
is reduced by cutting off the bottom section and leaving just the more
concentrated upper sections on the vine. Indeed, I have visited his vineyard in
September where there seemed to have been more grapes on the ground than on the
vine!
Such attention to detail can only be achieved by costly
effort and of course does merit a price which is somewhat similar to the price
of his Barolos. However its quality can only be measured perhaps against some
of the best examples from Bordeaux’s right bank. Certainly, in my book, at
around the same price as Clos Fourtet or Ch. Larcis Ducasse for that vintage,
it can definitely hold its own for price/quality ratio. It’s certainly up with
the likes of Vieux Château Certain or Troplong Mondot where you will pay up to
20% more. As stated above, there’s not much of it although one UK merchant is
offering the 2007 vintage at £80 a bottle in Bond, but the 2005 should be more expensive
– if you can find it.
Tasting notes? I don’t wasn’t to bore you with comparisons with
every other fruit except grapes, but three hours after I finished the last drop
in the bottle I can still feel the wine tingling the back of my palate – now that’s
what I call some length on the finish!
You can read more about Roberto Voerzio on page 273 of Wine Behind The Label.
Genoa - the fourth "M"
GENOA –
THE FOURTH “M”
There seems to be something with me and restaurants in Genoa
beginning with “M”. Having fallen in love with Mario, Mua and Il Marin – all
well worth a visit for entirely different reasons – I have now discovered a
fourth baby – Migone. Well, actually, the restaurant is called SanMatteo, but
the usp here is that it is attached to a wine shop called Migone under common
ownership.
So what’s the big deal?
Well, you can choose your wine from the shop and you will
just pay a small corkage charge over the retail price for your wine. This works
out at between €4 and €6 for a modestly priced wine to €8 to €10 for a grand vin where they will need to decant
and give you huge glasses etc.
Now this alerts to various possibilities. With my first two
choices on their restaurant wine list being out of stock, I was invited to go
into the shop and choose my wine. Bearing in mind what I had ordered, I felt
that something with a bit of body was needed – not a real Dolly Parton, but
something, say, a little chunky and which would not break the bank. The owner
helped me in my choice by suggesting a bottle of “Rigoleto” 2010 from the
excellent Colle Masari estate in the Montecucco DOC which abuts the Brunello
DOGC area. It’s organically produced to boot, for whom these things matter, a
blend of 70% Sangiovese, 15% Ciliegiolo and 15% Montepulciano and aged for 10
months 50% in stainless steel and 50% in barrique and tonneaux of second and
third wine. It was a pleasant drink with fruity spiciness on the palate but for
me it was really far too young to really appreciate, but at €13.50 in the
restaurant (€8.80 retail) I couldn’t really complain.
It did somewhat overpower the mezzelune ai porcini (half moon shaped stuffed pasta with wild
mushrooms) but fared better with the tagliata
di vitellone (grilled and sliced pieces of contrafillet or entrecote of
young bullock) and better still with the selection of strong cheeses with which
I finished the meal, although of course, by then it had plenty of time to
oxidise and soften up. The quality of the cuisine was perfectly sound – plain
and specialising in Genovese cuisine – there’s certainly no attempt to gain
Michelin stars here but is more geared to fitting in with the range of wine
choices from the 1,400 different labels in the shop. A three course meal here
will set you back about €35 and the wine choices are of course, endless.
I’m looking forward to coming back. It may not be for a
little while yet because I am saving up for a €100 bottle which I can drink in
then restaurant for €110. I’ll keep you posted.
Ristorante
SanMatteo/Enoteca Migone
Piazza
San Matteo 4/r, Genova
Tel: 010
247 3282
Open
Monday to Saturday for lunch and dinner, but also on Sundays during the month
of December
Monday, October 31, 2011
Eating at your covenience - even if it's on the next floor down
Our annual trip to the Wexford Opera Festival, as usual, produces a fine trio of operas that one goes to see for their scarcity value, if nothing else. At the same time, as we have recorded elsewhere on this website, we note the considerable increase in the quality of the restaurants over the 16 years we have been going there and our report on a fine new discovery this year will be reported in the next monthly update of the website.
However, this report will be destined for the Malessere section, as we encountered bitter disappointment at a long awaited restaurant we have failed to get into in the past. I am referring to the Sky View Cafe restaurant which sits on top of the newly constructed opera house (well, fairly newly constructed - it's about 3 years old now). The restaurant has magnificent views of Wexford's harbour and river, which is a terrific draw, apart from being so conveniently situated in the opera house itself.
The Sky View restaurant is not open post opera normally, but this year, for the first time the Sunday operas were scheduled to start at 5 p.m., so the restaurant WAS open post opera as the opera finished at around 7:15 and was not open for dinner pre opera on those days. They do have a snacky menu for lunch on all days, but this is not what we wanted to go there for. So as soon as the opera was over, we took the lift to the top floor and were shown to our allotted table. Unfortunately our table didn't have a view (only about 3 tables out of 10 have a complete view anyway) so there is obviously a mad scramble for these and we were beaten to the punch by habitués anyway. I needed to go the loo and to my surprise, was told that none were on the same floor as the restaurant but I had to go back into the opera house to find one. A bit irritating and I cursed the architect both down and up the stairs.
The menu was astonishingly short. First course choices consisted of a cheese crottin (3 tiny pieces of goat's cheese on a few rocket leaves), smoked trout (with a beetroot sauce) and a soup. I chose the smoked trout, but as I'm not keen on beetroot, I asked not to have any beetroot sauce. I needn't have bothered. Sure, I got my smoked trout without any beetroot (in fact without anything else and dryz' a bone, as they say in Australia), but one of my dining companions, who liked beetroot, had hers accompanied by four or five tiny blobs of beetroot on her plate, each the size of a ink blot, which I could have easily avoided. The quantity of trout given was pretty mean, too. The starters were preceded by what was described on the menu as 'amuses bouches' which consisted of a half inch slab of minced chicken which had the density of uranium.
Main course choices were either chicken, salmon or vegetarian. Now for a flagship restaurant of the Wexford Opera House, it's pretty astonishing that they are using just about the cheapest ingredients you can get in the catering industry - chicken and salmon. The chicken was pretty dry again - the mushroom sauce was nice but the roasted carrots and parsnips that came with it might have fared better in an Irish stew. I have to say that this menu showed an outstanding lack of imagination from the menu planner, compounded by the fact that the only fish starter was trout and the only fish main course was salmon. The whole of the catering operation here is contracted to the upmarket Ferrycarrig Hotel just across the river from Wexford and the menu had clearly been created by an accountant rather than a chef and specially geared towards a captive audience.
The above menu plus a two choice dessert (one of which was tirimisu, of course) and coffee was priced at €40.00 without service. When you compare this with what you can get at other good restaurants in Wexford with a lot more decent choices for little more than half this amount, you realise what outstandingly bad value this is. Furthermore, if you look on the Wexford Opera House website's restaurant page, you will see it priced at €25.00 - a discrepancy I didn't notice until I was halfway through writing this blog.
I have to say that we were so fed up and disappointed with this meal that we forewent the dessert and coffee and to their credit, they reduced the price to €30.00 a head. Nevertheless it didn't make up for the 15 euros worth of value we had.
A final word about the wines. The wine list mirrored the list of wines which are available by the glass or bottle in the opera house itself, consisting of 3 whites, 3 reds and 3 cuvées of Deutz Champagnes. Again really poor choices for a €40.00 meal. We chose a bottle of Delas Crozes Hermitage Blanc at €25.00 which was not overpriced for a restaurant and it's lack of character was a perfect match for the food. We could have had Deutz's Amour de Deutz 2005 at €195.00 with our chicken but perhaps it might have gone down as a better match in Kentucky.
However, this report will be destined for the Malessere section, as we encountered bitter disappointment at a long awaited restaurant we have failed to get into in the past. I am referring to the Sky View Cafe restaurant which sits on top of the newly constructed opera house (well, fairly newly constructed - it's about 3 years old now). The restaurant has magnificent views of Wexford's harbour and river, which is a terrific draw, apart from being so conveniently situated in the opera house itself.
The Sky View restaurant is not open post opera normally, but this year, for the first time the Sunday operas were scheduled to start at 5 p.m., so the restaurant WAS open post opera as the opera finished at around 7:15 and was not open for dinner pre opera on those days. They do have a snacky menu for lunch on all days, but this is not what we wanted to go there for. So as soon as the opera was over, we took the lift to the top floor and were shown to our allotted table. Unfortunately our table didn't have a view (only about 3 tables out of 10 have a complete view anyway) so there is obviously a mad scramble for these and we were beaten to the punch by habitués anyway. I needed to go the loo and to my surprise, was told that none were on the same floor as the restaurant but I had to go back into the opera house to find one. A bit irritating and I cursed the architect both down and up the stairs.
The menu was astonishingly short. First course choices consisted of a cheese crottin (3 tiny pieces of goat's cheese on a few rocket leaves), smoked trout (with a beetroot sauce) and a soup. I chose the smoked trout, but as I'm not keen on beetroot, I asked not to have any beetroot sauce. I needn't have bothered. Sure, I got my smoked trout without any beetroot (in fact without anything else and dryz' a bone, as they say in Australia), but one of my dining companions, who liked beetroot, had hers accompanied by four or five tiny blobs of beetroot on her plate, each the size of a ink blot, which I could have easily avoided. The quantity of trout given was pretty mean, too. The starters were preceded by what was described on the menu as 'amuses bouches' which consisted of a half inch slab of minced chicken which had the density of uranium.
Main course choices were either chicken, salmon or vegetarian. Now for a flagship restaurant of the Wexford Opera House, it's pretty astonishing that they are using just about the cheapest ingredients you can get in the catering industry - chicken and salmon. The chicken was pretty dry again - the mushroom sauce was nice but the roasted carrots and parsnips that came with it might have fared better in an Irish stew. I have to say that this menu showed an outstanding lack of imagination from the menu planner, compounded by the fact that the only fish starter was trout and the only fish main course was salmon. The whole of the catering operation here is contracted to the upmarket Ferrycarrig Hotel just across the river from Wexford and the menu had clearly been created by an accountant rather than a chef and specially geared towards a captive audience.
The above menu plus a two choice dessert (one of which was tirimisu, of course) and coffee was priced at €40.00 without service. When you compare this with what you can get at other good restaurants in Wexford with a lot more decent choices for little more than half this amount, you realise what outstandingly bad value this is. Furthermore, if you look on the Wexford Opera House website's restaurant page, you will see it priced at €25.00 - a discrepancy I didn't notice until I was halfway through writing this blog.
I have to say that we were so fed up and disappointed with this meal that we forewent the dessert and coffee and to their credit, they reduced the price to €30.00 a head. Nevertheless it didn't make up for the 15 euros worth of value we had.
A final word about the wines. The wine list mirrored the list of wines which are available by the glass or bottle in the opera house itself, consisting of 3 whites, 3 reds and 3 cuvées of Deutz Champagnes. Again really poor choices for a €40.00 meal. We chose a bottle of Delas Crozes Hermitage Blanc at €25.00 which was not overpriced for a restaurant and it's lack of character was a perfect match for the food. We could have had Deutz's Amour de Deutz 2005 at €195.00 with our chicken but perhaps it might have gone down as a better match in Kentucky.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)